I have been trained in typography and that can sometimes lead to a lot of frustrations.
Badly kerned type (the space between letters) is one of my pet gripes, as is over leading (the space between lines of type) and an incessant use of capital letters in headlines.
Just look at any American newspaper and you’ll get my drift regarding the last complaint.
There are many more that annoy me but these are a hinderance to legibility and therefore communication, and that pisses me off.
All this training has its downfalls.
I am so used to reading a page, according to the rule of hierarchy. And when it’s not applied properly I misread things.
Hierarchy is the order in which elements are placed on a page. It’s another technique typographers and designers use to aid comprehension.
When pages of type are designed by people who have English as a second language it becomes even more frustrating for me.
By not fully understanding the language, the designers place the elements in the wrong order and that disrupts my comprehension.
I spent five minutes looking for a particular item on a menu, until I discovered it was there right under my nose.
This isn’t their fault, it’s mine.
The problem is that it doesn’t follow my rules and I was blind to it being done another way.
It’s time to throw the rule book out and start to see things for what they are, not what I expect them to be.
This logo stands for nothing, just like the company.
Monday, June 26th, 2023PwC or Price Waterhouse Cooper, is a company that is well known in financial circles.
But now it’s known nation-wide – for all the wrong reasons.
I had heard of PwC but never been exposed to their corporate identity, until now.
However as this visual abhorrence keeps on featuring nightly in the news, I realised that there was a real connection between the logo and the company image – both are bad.
Below is a quote from the ABC’s business reporter, Daniel Ziffer, that really sums up just how rotten they are:
(PwC) “…..being involved in shaping secret government tax plans and then creating and selling a scheme to thwart them to multinational companies dubbed the ‘Dirty 30’.”
Now, in a last minute act of guilt, they have sold off all their government business for $1.
Of course this doesn’t take into account the millions they have already made fraudulently.
PwC is a large company and I am sure they would have paid a respected design firm a good price for this logo disaster.
I can only speculate that the client got their way with the design and the designers just took the money and ran.
If I were them, I’m not sure what I would be more embarrassed about now.
The logo or the company it represents.
Posted in Comment, Design, Grumbling | No Comments »